Nagasaki - Atomic Bomb Damage |
Neither these soldiers nor the thousands of others exposed to radiation in subsequent atomic bomb tests in Nevada and the Pacific who developed similar ailments were ever compensated for their sufferings by the U.S. government. Despite what must be considered overwhelming evidence, the government contended that radiation from the bombs dissipated quickly and that science had not yet proved conclusively that radiation poisoning and cancer were connected. "A 1980 Defense Nuclear Agency report concluded, “Medical science believes multiple myeloma has a borderline relationship with exposure to ionizing radiation. That is, there are some indications that exposure to radiation may increase the risk of this disease, but science cannot yet be sure.”
I asked Susan today whether she thought about what bad shape the world was in. She just gives that to God, she said. There was nothing she could do about it, so she did not worry about it. I wish I could do that. I do worry about the state of the world. And I don't put any faith in this country doing anything to improve it. I don't have to go any further than Nagasaki to realize that Americans have not changed since 1945. Indeed, our indifference to man has increased exponentially since then. That bomb on Nagasaki shows us all we really need to know about who Americans are.
2 comments:
I wonder what effect the fall-out had on the children born in my birth year. I was born a year after the bombs.
We have not changed much yet. Success does not encourage change. A few years of lack of success will work wonders... we already have the rise of intemperate ideologies... and all of the Great Compromisers are long gone...
Some day, if humanity survives itself, they may be able to measure the effects of the a-bombs on the rest of the world. But if the official position of the US government is that there's no correlation between disease and close exposure to a-blasts . . . well, any kind of explanation like that is a long way off indeed.
We haven't changed in the least.
Post a Comment