Wasn't it just a few days ago I was bemoaning the so-called health care reform effort now in progress in the US Congress? Indeed, it was. The subject is likely to appear several more times in coming weeks as the issue heats up in Congress. And one thing that's certain: unless the apparent course of events takes some sort of drastic new turn, it's going to heat me up also. The general temper--er, no pun intended--of my remarks the other day had to do with the lamentable lack of backbone our president appears to be afflicted with. Whereas happy, smiling faces all around the political spectrum is a nice vision (i.e., partisanship), the reality is Obama is in a knife fight with people determined to kill him. Offering to shake hands and have a discussion in the midst of the fight is a sure way to get a shiv in the ribs. In fact, what Obama needs to do is have somebody hand him a cutlass so he can slash his way through his enemies. Unfortunately, Obama doesn't want a cutlass; he wants a plate of cupcakes to offer the people who are trying to kill him.
Paul Krugman says Obama doesn't have enough audacity for the moment. Like me, he fears that Obama will sign what he can get out of Congress, and that he won't insist on anything. But this guarantees that what he will sign will reform nothing. It will, in fact, probably be as bad as what we have now. As Krugman says: "The point is that if you’re making big policy changes, the final form of the policy has to be good enough to do the job. You might think that half a loaf is always better than none — but it isn’t if the failure of half-measures ends up discrediting your whole policy approach."
The president is but one obstacle to a successful health care reform effort. The other is more numerous and in all likelihood more powerful, especially since Obama is the way he is. The other enemy is the ever present, oiled to the gills army of lobbyists who have descended upon the Congress like a swarm of locusts . . . actually more like ravenous rats who are going to chew the guts out of any meaningful health care reform bill. Make no mistake about it: the Republicans and lobbyists for the for-profit hospitals, the drug giants, and the insurance industry don't want any reform at all. They are gloriously happy with the present system which is rewarding them quite handsomely, thank you, but which is cost the American people about twice as much as the next most expensive health care system in the world. And they don't really give a flying fuck for what's best for the country, or some nonsensical concept like the greatest good for the greatest number. But they realize something is going to pass, so their job is to pass legislation which is as meaningless as possible and which preserves the status quo as much as possible. This is what they've set out to do with all their millions, and quite frankly, I have little hope, as I've said before, that Congress is going to be able to resist these blandishments--regardless of what the American people want, regardless of what is desperately needed.
So what I fear is passage of an unadulterated POS that Obama will claim is great for the country and sign with great fanfare surrounded by bunch of grinning politicians, every single one of whom knows that nothing has really been reformed at all.
6 comments:
The health care fight should be raucus and partisan: the Republicans should be portrayed as the devils they are, and the mid-term elections of 2010 should be entered beating the drums signaling their final battle.
From the 2010 elections, there should emerge a majority to pass meaningful health care.
Ah, my friend, the devils will not be just the GOP. To dilute reform out of all resemblance to the term, it will take Democrats as well. Part of the reason I'm so disgusted with the Obama approach to governing is that he doesn't kick the royal asses of these members of his own party who are in league with the devil. They helped and are helping dilute the energy bill, too.
True.
I hope Obama is not another one of our Ironies: what really happens is vastly different from what we thought would happen.
He may be setting the scene, waiting for us to do what you mention in a more recent post: get made as hell, yell that we won't stand for it any more, and screw the oligarchy!
Yes. I actually heard something encouraging about Obama yesterday on a podcast called "Best of the Left." The basic thrust was to ask whether Obama of the campaign was just a phony, a liar who would say anything to be elected of did he mean what he said. Is he really turning his back on everything he professed to be and believe in his pre-presidential life? Gives you pause.
Not that I'm going to relent on my criticism, but as this guy pointed out, there may be lots of things going on that I'm not aware of.
OK. Let us see . . .
I understand.
One of our most common stories or narratives is the guy who will say anything to get elected; it's got the status of a myth and urban legend.
That's how we see reality: liars, adulterers ( better known as Republicans), schemers...
I am not saying we don't have every reason to do so.
But I am saying that such a country is destroying itself by creating a vicious feedback loop of crime and its re-telling: the corrupt leaders inspire resentment, and the resentment gives rise to the stories, and the children growing hear the stories...and they may either copy or become cynics...
Talk about a ticking bomb scenario.
I really do want to believe that Obama represents a dominant trend towards a more humane approach to governing in this country. And, upon self-inspection, I'm the first to admit the true extent of my cynicism and distrust of rulers. As you say, it's not without evidence. I do not want this man to fail, but I'm at a loss to understand several decisions that have been made. No prosecution of the Bush era guilty, for example, and the beefed up war in Afghanistan. Not to mention the civil rights issues, the Bush policies he's left in place.
Don't want the kids to be cynics, for sure, but we really do have to stop giving them reason to be so.
Post a Comment